Michael van der Galiën: Founder and Editor-in-Chief
Michael van der Galiën is the founder and Editor-in-Chief. He is a 23-year-old former law, now American Studies student at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen in the Netherlands, where he was a member of the board of the Criminal Justice Student Organization called Simon van der Aa and he wrote for a studentmagazine about religion, politics and culture called Intensief Magazine. In January 2006, Michael founded the blog Liberty and Justice. Because of his love for the U.S, it was quite logical for him to write about international politics with a special focus on the U.S. In June 2006 he became a co-blogger and later (after quitting his own blog due to lack of time) assistant editor at The Moderate Voice. He resigned from that post in September 07.
In June 2007 Michael became Chief Political Reviewer at Monsters and Critics (section books) where his reviews are published approximately one week before they are published at this blog.
In September 2007, Michael became Correspondent in the Netherlands for Pajamas Media. He reports for them about Dutch politics, European politics and the transatlantic relationship.
Michael’s columns have been published in Turkish Daily News. For instance:
- “The Secular Elite vs. The Popular Islamists“
- “Time for a Change at the CHP“
Michael is a conservative liberal. As with every other political group, they don’t agree with each other on everything. His trademarks are: fiscally conservative, socially more liberal and hawkish on foreign policy.
Jason Steck: Assistant Editor:
Jason Steck is Resident Instructor in Political Science and International Relations at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. In his research and writing, he focuses on civil-military relations as well as the coexistence of conflict and cooperation in international security relations. Prior to his graduate education at the University of Minnesota, he served for 15 years in the United States Air Force, including 5 years at the United States Strategic Command. As a self-proclaimed “militant moderate”, Jason specializes in discussions on the nature and core principles of moderate politics and the role that centrism can play in redressing an increasingly polarized political culture. His residence also bridges the red-state/blue-state chasm, concurrently living in Omaha and in Saint Paul, Minnesota.
To read more about Jason, go to his page.
Dustin Metzger: Contributing Author
Dustin was born, 22 years ago, the eldest son (1 younger brother) to an average lower-middle-class family in a small city on the Mississippi river in Wisconsin, where he still lives. He is a full-time 3rd shift industrial equipment operator by trade and a full time robotics and electromechanical engineering student and dedicated blogger when he is not work.
O, he also has a fiancee. She and a few hours of sleep get squeezed in. Every now and then at least.
He has been interested in politics since a young age and, in fact, credits the Bill Clinton sexual indiscretions investigation and impeachment proceedings as the formative moment in my political life. His fiancee wonders what he means by that. As far as political views he is somewhat of a mixed bag - welcome to the club.
Through work he has first-hand experience with the damage illegal unskilled labor immigration is causing middle class Americans so he is strongly in favor of strong immigration enforcement. To him, it has nothing to do with race (as so many far-left liberals like to say) and everything to do with the fact that it’s his opinion America has no need, right, or responsibility to provide jobs to the rest of the world until and unless “we can take care of our own first.”
When it comes to domestic social issues (universal health care, religious freedoms, abortion, etc) he is definitely what most people would consider liberal.
He was born a Catholic but now considers himself an atheist, or more accurately simply not religious. It never really came up in his upbringing, so he takes it practically as a personal insult when people try to legislate their religious morality onto the rest of the population like it’s their right to do so.
He’s a strong proponent of the scientific method and if something can’t fit into a scientific framework (or even collapses under scientific scrutiny) ala creationism, numerology, or the like he’ against it.
Dustin’s definition of rights is entirely dependent on sentience and base opinions on abortion and animal rights accordingly.
When it comes to race and opinions on homosexuality neither has ever been a big factor in his life. A person’s a person, and he credits my mother for instilling that world view on him. In fact, he has a hard time grasping how people can even be racist or homophobic, let along act on it.
Furthermore, Dustin is a strong proponent of fiscal responsibility in government and personal life. When he first moved out of my parents shelter he made a couple of wrong moves and learned first-hand why fiscal responsibility is important.
As do we all.
Lastly, he is somewhat obsessed with generational politics. In particular the interplay between our generations’ experiences and the world, laws, and norms is something he often thinks about and, when given the chance, often writes about.
Kevin Sullivan: Contributing Author
Kevin Sullivan is the Assistant Editor of Real Clear Blogs, and the founder of his own blog, Mulling It Over From The Middle. Kevin is a frequent contributor at Donklephant, and in addition to that, has been featured on Political Derby and the RCP Blog at TIME Magazine.
Kevin’s lives and works in Washington, DC.
Marc Moore: Contributing Author
Marc Moore is a systems analyst who has worked in the software field for nearly 20 years, working in both the public and private sectors and as a consultant. In his spare time Marc is a devoted husband and father of 3 amazing children. He enjoys attending a small community church, alternative Christian music, playing Canasta, the all-too-rare good movie, hard science fiction, and the novels of Ayn Rand. Marc is a runner of no renown whatever and, on the web, is the founder of and primary contributor to Black Shards.
Meltem: Contributing Author
Meltem is a Turkish woman living in America. She is a modern woman, brought up with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s principles and, therefore, a strong defender of secularism and advocate of women’s rights. Her view on the press and, thus, bloggers can be summarized (in the words of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk) thusly:
“The press is the nation’s shared voice. It is an innovator, a school and a power in itself.”
Although she lives in America, she remains devoted to the wellbeing of Turkey. To inform Turks but especially foreigners about what is happening in Turkey, she runs the website Turkish Digest: an absolute must read for all those interested in this part of the world.
Pieter Dorsman: Contributing Author
Pieter Dorsman is a Dutchman currently living in Vancouver where he runs his own consulting firm, Redpeaks Management Inc. that advises early stage technology companies on their financing and business strategies. Prior to this he held a number of senior positions at UBS in Hong Kong where he was responsible for project and corporate finance mandates in Asia, primarily in Indonesia, China and Thailand. He joined UBS in 1994 after an attachment to Barclays Bank’s structured finance team in Hong Kong. Before moving to Hong Kong he lived and worked in London where he started his career at Barclays. Pieter obtained a Master’s degree in Economic and Social History at the Erasmus Universiteit in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
As passionate as he is about business and the markets, Pieter has had a longtime fascination with politics, history and world affairs. So, in early 2003 he launched Peaktalk, a weblog about international politics. Some of Peaktalk’s posts have appeared in the National Post, one of Canada’s largest newspapers and more recently Pajamas Media ran some of Pieter’s columns. He has also appeared on a number of radio shows in the “US and Canada to talk about European news and developments. It’s hard to label Pieter politically, yet he considers himself to be a classical liberal. On the role of government and economic policies he has strong Reaganite and Thatcherite instincts, whereas on social issues he mixes Dutch pragmatism with a libertarian outlook and he has therefore no problems with gay marriage or legalizing drugs and prostitution, and also believes that citizens should have the right to carry guns. As it has become fashionable to reveal your Iraq-war position, Pieter is not afraid to admit that he supported the 2003 invasion, a position largely shaped by the successive foreign policy debacles of the 1990s: Bosnia, Iraq, Rwanda and East-Timor, to name a few. US and Canada to talk about European news and developments.
Daniel Pawson: Contributing Author and Resident Expert
Dan is the legislative director for a state senator in a northeastern state. (We’d point out it’s a blue state, but that’s really not necessary, is it?) He is a lawyer by education but a politics junkie at heart, and is taking wagers on whether he’ll ever end up arguing in front of a judge. (As a defendant doesn’t count.) Dan runs his own blog, Last Moderate Republican, whenever he is not distracted for months by shiny coins, and has been featured on National Journal’s Hotline.
Dan is the product of a conservative Republican and a somewhat apathetic Democrat, which probably explains why he was one of three Republicans in his high school graduating class of 190. He is a socially liberal, fiscally conservative GOP’er with an unhealthy hatred of the national debt and a slight crush on Barry Goldwater. He had fantasies about John McCain being another Goldwater — McH20? — but has been sorely disabused. Ah, well. Maybe next cycle.
Marc Schulman: Contributing Author
Marc Schulman received a BS in Political Science from MIT in 1967 and an MBA from the Sloan School of Management in 1972. He is a retired Wall Street securities analyst and corporate consultant. A liberal on social issues, Marc is best-described as a Truman Democrat on matters pertaining to national security. In 2004, Marc founded the American Future blog, which focuses on American foreign and defense policy, terrorism, and international relations.
Benjamin P. Gage: Contributing Author
Benjamin Gage is an American currently living in Istanbul. He grew up in New England and graduated from the University of Chicago in 2006 with an undergraduate degree in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations. Having studied the Turkish language and traveled by bus through much of Anatolia, he is now working for a publisher of political-economy reports in Istanbul. His favorite Turkish football team is Trabzonspor.
Benjamin hosts his own blog, The Bosphorus Watch, which analyzes geopolitical issues related to Turkey and the region.
Brian Mathey: Resident Expert (Economy and Financial Markets)
After graduating magna cum laude from law school, Brian sat on the board of directors of a bank in Kansas City and currently works for a (well known) multi-national financial services company. His choice to work in the financial sector was an easy one: he has been a student of the market for as long as he can remember.
He monitors the market daily and is particularly troubled by the current fluxuations in the international currency market.
Andrew Quinn: Contributing Author
Andrew Quinn has been writing about politics since he was a sixth-grader. Now a high school junior, the writer, jazz musician, and student still spends a plurality of his free time trying to crack the issues of the day, and share his solutions with others. He remains unaffiliated with any party or set ideology, preferring a practical combination of pragmatic and idealistic positions.
Preferring vastly his high school courses in history, English, and music to those in math and science, Andrew expects to study in International Relations, Public Policy, or Law after high school though such decisions are always subject to change. Over the years, Quinn has contributed to The Moderate Voice, Blogcritics, Dean’s World, Redstate, served as the youth affairs columnist at the now-defunct Blue-and-Red, and maintained several of his own blogs in addition to remaining active in local politics. Andrew lives in suburbian Chicago, Illinois, USA with his family.
Bert de Bruin (Yonathan Dror Bar-On): Resident Expert
Bert is a historian who specialized in modern Jewish history and in history of the Middle East. In 1995 he emigrated from the Netherlands to Israel. His doctoral thesis deals with “Jews in Post-Liberation France, 1944-49″. His opinion articles have been published in Dutch and Israeli newspapers and magazines. He keeps a weblog, Dutchblog Israel which is definitely worth a daily visit. For The Gazette he will occasionally write articles and analyses, mostly about Israel/Holland related subjects.
He’s currently working on his Ph.D.










Hey Michael, this looks like some good stuff. I’m trying to add you to the Blogroll, but feel free to check me out at:
http://globalinteractions.wordpress.com/
I think we might agree on quite a few issues, but it would be great to have your comments and analysis regardless.
Keep up the good work!
Kent
Thought you might like to know your blog headline is featured among 16 other headlines from today in this video I uploaded to youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hto70h6q3M
After everything is said and done in this election, a few insightful folks
may soon recognize the Iraq War as the most serious thing threatening the
future of the USA. I hope your readers have read New Mexico Governor Bill
Richardson’s op/ed piece from the Washington Post on how and why we must get
out of Iraq, from about 11 days ago.If not, here it is, in full, after a few
introductory remarks by me:
There is a much larger scale confrontation with Bush from the candidates
regarding the Iraq War and the problems it is continuing to cause, after six
years of Halliburton and Brown and Root and Blackwater corporate
kleptocracy. Only one candidate, it is abundantly clear to me, is really
slamming the truth and providing the logistics and rationale for ending this
disastrous war: Bill Richardson. This article was printed in the Washington
Post about 10 days ago, and please take the time to read it:
_______________________
Why We Should Exit Iraq Now
By Bill Richardson
Saturday, September 8, 2007; A15
Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards have suggested that there is
little difference among us on Iraq. This is not true: I am the only leading
Democratic candidate committed to getting all our troops out and doing so
quickly.
In the most recent debate, I asked the other candidates how many troops they
would leave in Iraq and for what purposes. I got no answers. The American
people need answers. If we elect a president who thinks that troops should
stay in Iraq for years, they will stay for years — a tragic mistake.
Clinton, Obama and Edwards reflect the inside-the-Beltway thinking that a
complete withdrawal of all American forces somehow would be “irresponsible.”
On the contrary, the facts suggest that a rapid, complete withdrawal — not a
drawn-out, Vietnam-like process —would be the most responsible and effective
course of action.
Those who think we need to keep troops in Iraq misunderstand the MiddleEast.
I have met and negotiated successfully with many regional leaders,including
Saddam Hussein. I am convinced that only a complete withdrawal can
sufficiently shift the politics of Iraq and its neighbors to break the
deadlock that has been killing so many people for so long.
Our troops have done everything they were asked to do with courage &
professionalism, but they cannot win someone else’s civil war. So long as
American troops are in Iraq, reconciliation among Iraqi factions is
postponed. Leaving forces there enables the Iraqis to delay taking the steps
to end the violence. And it prevents us from using diplomacy to bring in
other nations to help stabilize and rebuild the country.
The presence of American forces in Iraq weakens us in the war against al-
Qaeda. It endows the anti-American propaganda of those who portray us as
occupiers plundering Iraq’s oil and repressing Muslims. The day we leave,
this myth collapses, and the Iraqis will drive foreign jihadists out of
their country. Our departure would also enable us to focus on defeating the
terrorists who attacked us on Sept. 11, those headquartered along the
Pakistan-Afghanistan border — not in Iraq.
Logistically, it would be possible to withdraw in six to eight months. We
moved as many as 240,000 troops into and out of Iraq through Kuwait in as
little as a three-month period during major troop rotations. After the
Persian Gulf War, we redeployed nearly a half-million troops in a few
months. We could redeploy even faster if we negotiated with the Turks to
open a route out through Turkey.
As our withdrawal begins, we will gain diplomatic leverage. Iraqis will
start seeing us as brokers, not occupiers. Iraq’s neighbors will face the
reality that if they don’t help with stabilization, they will face the
consequences of Iraq’s collapse — including even greater refugee flows over
their borders and possible war.
The United States can facilitate Iraqi reconciliation and regional
cooperation by holding a conference similar to that which brought peace to
Bosnia. We will need regional security negotiations among all of Iraq’s
neighbors and discussions of donations from wealthy nations — including oil-
rich Muslim countries — to help rebuild Iraq. None of this can happen until
we remove the biggest obstacle to
diplomacy: the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq.
My plan is realistic because:
It is less risky. Leaving forces behind leaves them vulnerable. Would we
need another surge to protect them?
It gets our troops out of the quagmire and strengthens us for our real
challenges. It is foolish to think that 20,000 to 75,000 troops could bring
peace to Iraq when 160,000 have not. We need to get our troops out of the
crossfire in Iraq so that we can defeat the terrorists who attacked us on
Sept. 11.
By hastening the peace process, the likelihood of prolonged bloodshed is
reduced. President Richard Nixon withdrew U.S. forces slowly from Vietnam —
with disastrous consequences. Over the seven years it took to get our troops
out, 21,000 more Americans and perhaps a million Vietnamese, most of them
civilians, died. All this death and destruction accomplished nothing — the
communists took over as soon as we left.
My position has been clear since I entered this race: Remove all the troops
and launch energetic diplomatic efforts in Iraq and internationally to bring
stability. If Congress fails to end this war, I will remove all troops
without delay, and without hesitation, beginning on my first day in office.
Let’s stop pretending that all Democratic plans are similar. The American
people deserve precise answers from anyone who would be commander in chief.
How many troops would you leave in Iraq? For how long? To do what, exactly?
And the media should be asking these questions of the candidates, rather
than allowing them to continue saying, “We are against the war . . . but
please don’t read the small print.”
The writer is governor of New Mexico and a candidate for the Democratic
presidential nomination.
http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/soldier-of-orange-1917-2007/
Hello
Sorry I forgot to submit my question or comment. I really like the banner that you use, with the autumnal picture of a park and leaves blowing. Tell me, is that the Vondelpark, and, if not, where is it?
Thanks,
Tony Pope
No - that was designed by a reader, Tom.
It is with a heavy heart to hear that evil has been allowed to gather so much dust in the hearts of individuals so young. It shows me the wisdom of our family home evenings when we share golden moments with our chidren. I wonder if those who beat up the elders know anything about golden times except for those they had in school. We Mormons are blessed. May the almighty forgive their tormented souls, Amen.
[...] I suppose when you’ve got an editor-in-chief and founder, an assistant editor and administrator, an assistant editor and contr… to support, you’ve got to get out the blegging bowl now and then, especially when you have [...]
Michael, have I been banned? Some of my posts aren’t showing up on some of he discussion pages?
No. We banned some people who were organizing online (Armenians) against this blog and then a side effect was, seemingly, that I have to approve all comments
I think it’s fixed now.
Thanks, yeah some of those folks were pretty angry and very uncivilized!
Edit by MvdG: obsessive Armenian-Americans should consider visiting websites that actually care about their obsessions and distortions.
thanks for this blog.
thanks for Today’s Zaman’s link.
thank you Michael van der Galiën.
Fatih: no problem and… I wish I was now in the beautiful city you are.
O Izmir!
İzmir’in kavakları
Dökülür yaprakları
Bize de derler Çakıcı
Yar fidan boylum
Yakarız konakları
Selvim senden uzun yok
Yaprağında düzüm yok
Kamalı da zeybek vuruldu
Yar fidan boylum
Çakıcı’ya sözüm yok
Dear Michael van der Galiën.
i think İstanbul is more beatiful than İzmir.
I am in İzmir now for my university.But i want to live in İstanbul. thank you for your reply.
best wishes….
Canım İstanbul
Ruhumu eritip de kalıpta dondurmuşlar;
Onu İstanbul diye toprağa kondurmuşlar.
İçimde tüten birşey; hava, renk, eda, iklim;
O benim, zaman, mekan aşıp geçmiş sevgilim.
Çiçeği altın yaldız, suyu telli pulludur;
Ay ve güneş ezelden iki İstanbulludur.
Denizle toprak, yalnız onda ermiş visale,
Ve kavuşmuş rüyalar, onda, onda misale.
İstanbul benim canım;
Vatanım da vatanım…
İstanbul,
İstanbul…
Tarihin gözleri var, surlarda delik delik;
Servi, endamlı servi, ahirete perdelik…
Bulutta şaha kalkmış Fatih`ten kalma kır at;
Pırlantadan kubbeler, belki bir milyar kırat…
Şahadet parmağıdır göğe doğru minare;
Her nakışta o mana: Öleceğiz ne çare?..
Hayattan canlı ölüm, günahtan baskın rahmet;
Beyoğlu tepinirken ağlar Karacaahmet…
O manayı bul da bul!
İlle İstanbul`da bul!
İstanbul,
İstanbul…
Boğaz gümüş bir mangal, kaynatır serinliği;
Çamlıca`da, yerdedir göklerin derinliği.
Oynak sular yalının alt katına misafir;
Yeni dünyadan mahzun, resimde eski sefir.
Her akşam camlarında yangın çıkan Üsküdar,
Perili ahşap konak, koca bir şehir kadar…
Bir ses, bilemem tanbur gibi mi, ud gibi mi?
Cumbalı odalarda inletir “Katibim”i…
Kadını keskin bıçak,
Taze kan gibi sıcak.
İstanbul,
İstanbul…
Yedi tepe üstünde zaman bir gergef işler!
Yedi renk, yedi sesten sayısız belirişler…
Eyüp öksüz, Kadıkoy süslü, Moda kurumlu,
Adada rüzgar, uçan eteklerden sorumlu.
Her şafak Hisarlarda oklar çıkar yayından
Hala çığlıklar gelir Topkapı sarayından.
Ana gibi yar olmaz, İstanbul gibi diyar;
Güleni şoyle dursun, ağlayanı bahtiyar…
Gecesi sünbül kokan
Türkçesi bülbül kokan,
İstanbul,
İstanbul…
Necip Fazıl Kısakürek