<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bush Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/</link>
	<description>Politics and world events from a moderately liberal and conservative perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VF on Gore, Bush &#171; The Van Der Galiën Gazette</title>
		<link>http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/#comment-28867</link>
		<dc:creator>VF on Gore, Bush &#171; The Van Der Galiën Gazette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/#comment-28867</guid>
		<description>[...] has permeated what is left of the Bush presidency by Todd Purdum. If you wonder why I felt that last week&#8217;s speech was &#8216;2003&#8242; read Purdum&#8217;s piece, as it nicely corroborates my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has permeated what is left of the Bush presidency by Todd Purdum. If you wonder why I felt that last week&#8217;s speech was &#8216;2003&#8242; read Purdum&#8217;s piece, as it nicely corroborates my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xel</title>
		<link>http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/#comment-28233</link>
		<dc:creator>Xel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/the-bush-speech/#comment-28233</guid>
		<description>When putting more troops in in order to create something tangible that would please the US people failed, they take troops out in order to stimulate the people a little (well, that, and troops cannot sustain operations fifteen months on, let alone 18). What's wrong with all this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When putting more troops in in order to create something tangible that would please the US people failed, they take troops out in order to stimulate the people a little (well, that, and troops cannot sustain operations fifteen months on, let alone 18). What&#8217;s wrong with all this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
